Athens Exchange
  • home
  • daily
  • athens
  • music
  • film & tv
  • food
  • sports
  • sci & tech
  • popfest 2008
 
Friday, March 12, 2010
Weather: , °
search:  


Post a Comment        E-mail To A Friend        Join The List        AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Top Ten Reasons Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Doesn't Work

by Mike Turner, Len Neighbors
05/23/2008

There are spoilers in here.

Remember when your friend went to see Episode One and warned you to never, ever see it because it would destroy part of your childhood? We're that guy, and we're talking about Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.

We had faith. Spielberg was involved, so maybe he would moderate Lucas' worst tendencies: the gratuitous use of computer animation, the boring and trite dialog, and the insufficient story. We were wrong about that. This movie was so bad that Lucas and Spielberg should have started over once they saw the final product. They might be rich enough to do that.

In fact, there are so many issues with Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull that we thought it would be easier to make a top ten list of reason this movie was depressing. So depressing that Spielberg and Lucas should send us all a stimulus check like Bush did.

10. There's no mystery. Spielberg is the sort of fellow who tells you the punch line to a joke before telling the joke, and then insists on going through the whole joke anyway. We see that they're in Area 51 in the opening scene, and everyone knows that means ALIENS. There's no reason to reveal this until we see the titular Crystal Skull. So we're stuck in the theater, not wondering about anything.

In fact, we know exactly what the Skull is supposed to do the whole time. With the Ark and the Grail, we at least had to wonder what would power they possessed, if any. With this, the only suspense is what the special effect will look like in the final scene.

9. The irrelevant characters. Ray Winstone's character is irrelevant to the story. He appears, disappears, crosses and doublecrosses, and there is no reason his character needs to be in this bloated film. Same with Marian Ravenwood. In fact, it seems like they finished the film, then tacked her scenes onto the movie with a staple gun.

8. Even the archaeology stuff is uninteresting. In Raiders of the Lost Ark, Indy uses the amulet at a certain time of day to find the location of the Ark. The idea of ancient geometry and miniature cities and legends was very cool. In this movie, Indy just announces translations of ancient graffiti. We never have an opportunity to engage it. The archaeology in this story is bland exposition, not part of the fun.

7. Shia LaBeouf. We actually like the kid. He was fine in Transformers, and we even liked the Project Greenlight movie, but he is terribly miscast here. Are we the only ones that can see that Josh Hartnett already is Indiana Jones? He just needs to be sent to wardrobe. Make some movies about the younger Indy, and use Hartnett.

Remember when Indy is telling the story about riding with Pancho Villa? Put Josh Hartnett in that movie and you'll get nine more dollars out of each of us.

6. No intensity. At no point did we gasp, cringe, tense up, wonder, or feel nervous. It was like watching cards being dealt. We didn't know exactly which card we'd see, but we knew the complete set so nothing could be that surprising. If this movie had been called Wichita Sam and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull it would have simply been laborious, but the fact that it is an Indiana Jones movie, with all the faith and expectation and waiting that that entails, made it positively painful to watch.

5. Embarrassing moments. From the photo of Sean Connery on Indy's desk to our glimpse of the Ark in a broken crate, there seemed to be an agenda: remind the audience of the movies this one is not. Harrison Ford gives it the old college try, but the dialog never really works, and there were way too many references to how old he is.

4. The aliens. Let's assume for a moment that the entire alien angle for the story was a good idea. The Crystal Skull looks like the alien from Alien, and watching John Hurt carry it around like a football, all the while behaving as if he is actually in a Harry Potter film is a bit much. If he had fallen over and a baby alien had come out of his belly, we might have been on board. When we finally see the alien, it looks like the alien head that gets printed on rolling papers for stoners. After all this time, with all the creative energy involved in the project, the alien is the same alien we've seen a thousand times.

3. Over the top situations. There's a scene in one of the Jurassic Park movies where one of the children, a gymnast we have learned, uses her gym moves to kill one of the dinosaurs. This is the sort of thing that makes an audience cringe, and ruins an otherwise interesting action sequence. There were no fewer than five such cringe moments in Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

*Indy avoids a nuclear blast by getting into a fridge, which is then hurled into the desert.
*They take a little boat car over two gigantic waterfalls.
*Every romantic moment in the film
*Marian Ravenwood clutching the steering wheel of the boat car on the bank of the lake
*Mutt's hair-combing affectation is NOT charming like Indy's hat trick

We expect a level of unrealistic action, and the other Indiana Jones movies have plenty of it, but the scenes in the new movie go so far that they end up insulting the audience.

2. They couldn't even use Cate Blanchett well. Don't get us wrong - we'd pay money to watch Blanchett read the phone book, but there is absolutely nothing going on with her character in this film. She is without motivation, totally unthreatening, and her lines are flat. Maybe she wasn't given anything to work with, but Galadriel with a BDSM outfit and no glowing aura doesn't get it done. Its not like she had to bring everything to the party... everyone knew someone else would bring the whip.

1. The computer animation. It just looks fake, and we were unable to suspend disbelief long enough to get into the story. At the end when they're running through the flooding water, you can tell the water is behind them and in front of them, like Photoshop layers, but they're not getting wet. The chase scene through the jungle suffers from the same problems... perspective doesn't work, the background almost blends, but not quite. The ants looked like a knock-off scene from the Mummy. And don't get us started on the prairie dogs, which look like they're from the intro video for Railroad Tycoon 3. We're calling them Sand Ewoks.

The whole thing looks like National Treasure. The earlier films look so good because everything was tangible. They actually flipped that truck over, and someone had to hang on to the bullwhip (yes, we know it was a safety harness, etc). It fooled the eye. This doesn't, and it goes to prove that animation for its own sake is about the only thing that can kill Indiana Jones.

Technorati Tags

Indiana Jones   Crystal Skull   Harrison Ford   Cate Blanchett   Shia Labeouf   Steven Spielberg   George Lucas  

Comments   [post a comment]

your review is about as corny as the cristal skull itself.

Posted By:

joel otero [Website]

05/24/2008

11:52 AM

i normally never post on the internet, but i just wanted to make the point on number 7. If you knew very much about Indy, you would know that the story of him with pancho villa has already been done and filmed. look it up.

Posted By:

Jakey B

05/24/2008

8:52 PM

Josh Harnett?

Posted By:

Iowa Jones

05/27/2008

1:27 PM

I myself thoroughly enjoyed the movie. I thought the whole alien thing a little too silly, but apart from that a very enjoyable action movie.

Enough tension, action, and laughs to keep it going up until the UFO, at which point me and my mates laughed. But nonetheless, good movie.

Perhaps you should clean the sand out of your vagina? Most of your point are simply faecetious.

Posted By:

Anon

05/27/2008

2:32 PM

You're spot on about what makes this movie so terrible. (You could have mentioned the monkies, though...at whose first appearance, the movie visibly cratered. And after it turned out that the leader monkey had the same pompadour as Shia, several people actually walked out of the theatre).

On the other hand, your inexplicable love for Josh Hartnett is bizarre.

Posted By:

Jordan

05/27/2008

2:46 PM

Theres two reviews for this movie: From a die-hard indi fan this movie competly sucks. From someone who enjoys the movies but not die hard the movie is good but mediocre at best

Posted By:

tompson

05/27/2008

4:00 PM

I thought that was spot on... When I saw it, I realized Spielberg is in for a shit exit from the film industry.

Posted By:

Josh

05/27/2008

4:06 PM

Can anyone here ever just watch a movie and enjoy it? Or does it have to always be so technical with you dumbasses?

Posted By:

jonathan

05/27/2008

5:04 PM

amen brudda!

Posted By:

brudda

05/27/2008

5:04 PM

Its funny how many people worship a zombie and santa (Jesus and "God") and think aliens are a ridiculous idea.

Posted By:

todzzgod

05/27/2008

5:06 PM

Wow, you basically took the points you didn't like and blew them way out of proportion. I agree this movie wasn't as good as the old Indy movies, but who was going in there expecting that. It seems your biggest gripes about the movie is some of the actors they choose for the parts. Thats retarded, everyone is this movie did a great job, and just because they didn't choose your favorite actors doesn't make it bad.

FYI, the reason they made this a alien movie is because that was the type of movie was prevalent in the 1950's era. And the hair combing this wasn't suppose to replace Indy's hat. He was a greaser, thats what they did.

Posted By:

Bob

05/27/2008

5:12 PM

You guys are flat out worst film critics ever. It seams like you saw a point in the movie, then sat there thing about how stupid you thought it was not paying attention to THE MOVIE until you see another small tiny unimportant detail and decide to hate that as well.

next time you guys watch a movie, do us all a favor and keep your retarded points and views to your self. don't quit you day job, cause that review you just wrote, tells nothing about what the movie was like and how it was. it just shows how fucking retarded you are.

Posted By:

Micheal

05/27/2008

5:21 PM

I don't find aliens a ridiculous idea...I find aliens on Earth a ridiculous idea.

Posted By:

Alex

05/27/2008

5:24 PM

I could not agree more with you. As I was walking out of the cinema I turned to my girlfriend and said "They f%$ked it. Why'd they have to put aliens in Indy!" At which point she corrected me "Interdimensional beings not aliens" Bloody Spielberg and Lucas.

Posted By:

Stupidfish

05/27/2008

5:40 PM

While I agree with many of your points, you should be aware that the Pancho Villa reference was actually a reference to the Young Indiana Jones TV show. In fact, it was part of the pilot episode.

Posted By:

Colin

05/27/2008

6:36 PM

I think you went into the movie already hating it. And there has already been dozens of movies of the young Indy.

Posted By:

Jamison

05/27/2008

6:41 PM

WTF was with those stupid gohpers! It probably cost my weeks pay just to add those retarted scenes. JAR JAR BINKS comes to mind....

Posted By:

Hans

05/27/2008

6:42 PM

You covered everything I felt was wrong with this film. But the foundation problem is Lucas's writing. He insists on clinging to the Joseph Campbell school of screenplays, which does not work any longer. It's too trite, too overused, too boring. The problem is Lucas and his scripts: it has been for a lot of films he's done, and how he wrecked Star Wars I, II, III and now Indiana. He has a habit of getting excellent talent (like Neeson, MacGregor, Blanchett) and doing nothing with them. Or controlling them to the point they can't do a thing with the role. It's unfortunate, but until he learns to get out of the way of his characters and let someone else write (as he did Leigh Brackett for Empire), all we're going to get is the same old crap from him. I'm sorry for Spielberg, Ford and the rest; they did their best with a crap plot.

Posted By:

wednesday

05/27/2008

7:19 PM

Lucas said in a documentary for "Star Wars" that he asks for special effects that are just good enough to get by, and calls that good enough. I suppose Spielberg didn't argue, or didn't win the argument for better effects.

Posted By:

K.

05/27/2008

7:22 PM

Josh Hartnett?

Please no...

And yeah, the aliens were ridiculous, but overall the movie was entertaining. Certainly NOT Raiders of the Lost Ark etc. but Shia was good and I'm kind of oddly looking forward to 20 years from now when they release his part as Indy.

Posted By:

Erik

05/27/2008

7:25 PM

well overall i agree with the review. I went into the cinema expecting a good add to the franchise like die hard 4, however it was nothing like die hard 4. In the past year i have not had much of a problem with a film, for the most part every one i have seen has been atleast ok. But the new indy film was, for lack of a better word, shit. Yeah i didn't like shia swinging through vines or indy surviving a nucleur blast because he was in a lead lined fridge but to be honest it was the aliens that did it for me. I know it is set in the 50s but cmon spielberg that doesn't mean you have to turn indy sci-fi just because you are now obsessed with that genre. Dont get me wrong i love sci-fi. I also loved the story of aliens being worshiped as gods by ancient civilisations. (also did they come back to life!? they came out of the stone didn't they? oh jesus i forgot that) Anyway i did not like the story in an indiana jones film. By including aliens spielberg you have contradicted the other films that were based on RELIGIOUS beliefs. So aliens exist? god forgot to mention that in the bible. Anyway the bit where a new dimension opens and the alien reappears and then the giant spaceship flew away with way too much cgi surrounding it just pissed me off. The film stole from the mummy and even got outlines of its plot from alien vs predator. When that happens steven you should know its a bad idea. Well lucas killed star wars its fitting that spielberg should help kill another franchise i loved. Well done you pretentious prick.

Posted By:

Adam

05/27/2008

7:27 PM

Shut up. It's just a movie.

Posted By:

Ashley

05/27/2008

9:50 PM

First off before you go see this movie familiarize yourself with the theory on where the real crystal skulls come from. With out this prior knowledge the movie will be lost on you.

Second this is Indiana Jones. This is not the real world. Enjoy that fact. If you enjoy living in the fantasy for a couple hours this film is Awesome.

Overall can honestly say I dig this flick. It is a movie for movie whores.

I purposefully am not going into any detail because the whole movie needs to be enjoyed from beginning to end with no spoilers. The way every movie should be experienced.

I could wax poetic about visual style and acting and all that jazz but all you really need to know is that this Indiana Jones and no matter what anyone says you are going to go see it because it is Indiana Jones and because Indy has been a part of our lives for so many years we have to see that magic again.

Go see it but take the mind you had as a child and make sure you know a bit about the theroized origins of the crystal skulls and I guarantee you will see that magic one more time.

Posted By:

The Movie Whore [Website]

05/27/2008

10:01 PM

Why is the idea of Indy surviving a blast in a refrigerator more ridiculous than Indy, Willie, and Short Round surviving jumping out of a plane in a life raft onto a mountain?

And why are aliens more ridiculous than Christian lore? Or magical glowing Indian rocks?

HMM?

Posted By:

emily

05/27/2008

10:02 PM

You'll believe that Indy can prove there was a holy son of God but you scoff at Aliens?

Posted By:

Faux

05/27/2008

10:04 PM

I really can't believe all the gripping over the aliens. The first movie is about gods bloody power in a box. Yeah that is soooo believable. It was a very entertaining movie. You fucking retards look at this movie as if it was going to be nominated for best picture. Of course its not. None of the other movies were amazing, they were just ENTERTAINING. Thats the whole point of them. Im so sick of all these tight-asses thinking that they are too good for this movie, it was great. It tied up loose ends and acted as a nice end to a great series. Pull your heads out of your asses and may be you might have a little fun next time you go see a film.

Posted By:

Dave

05/27/2008

10:13 PM

Seriously,….I love you, I mean, amen to that Mike. This movie was so horribly over the top and just plain…SICKENING. That at the end me and my fiancé just curled up into the fetal position and shook. !!!WHAT THE HELL! Spielberg and Lucus you have ruined something that could of been amazing…. You took your baby and then shoved it in to a sack and started beating it with nail-bats. I had to leave the theater twice…my fiancé stayed in the hopes that the movie would redeem itself… But to no avail…. We both wanted refunds, that is 2 hours of my life forever lost. Spielberg and Lucus you have now been boycotted from our movie watching until the day we die. If I ever have the chance to meet one or both of them I am going binge on oysters, spam and banana-milk all day and then projectile vomit all over them. "TAKE THAT! You rapists of cinematic entertainment!"

Posted By:

rorke

05/27/2008

11:21 PM

seriously can anyone just go to a movie theater without any expectations and just enjoy a fucking movie. Those of you that sit here and analyze every fucking little detail...get a grip...have you ever heard of fiction and non-fiction? Maybe you should go and look them up and see what world you live in, and just go and enjoy a fucking movie once in a while...
Oh and when is the last time any one of you made a movie that grossed over $152 million in less than a week...yeah what now bitches!!!

Posted By:

Ilikemovies

05/28/2008

12:45 AM

One more thing...about point three...
*They take a little boat car over two gigantic waterfalls

It was three waterfalls...maybe you should watch closer and pay attention...

And about his hair...
*Mutt's hair-combing affectation is NOT charming like Indy's hat trick

Its not supposed to be charming...hes a fuckin greaser...maybe you should read up on the 50's...that is what they did to their hair...

Posted By:

Ilikemovies

05/28/2008

12:57 AM

...Josh Hartnett?

Posted By:

_

05/28/2008

03:42 AM

Good job breaking this down. I really wanted to enjoy this movie but it was terrible. I don't think it was too much to ask for a movie at least on par with Temple of Doom (the worst of the Indy films... well not any more)But they gave us a move on par with Jar Jar Binks. I don't know how any one could watch that and come out happy about what they just saw.

Posted By:

T-rev

05/28/2008

08:33 AM

I think your mom is a retarded idea.

Posted By:

_

05/28/2008

08:37 AM

I can't believe only one other person mentioned the Tarzan scene with the monkeys coming to the aid of the good guys as the most retarded scene in the whole movie. How could the article mention the atom bomb scene and not that. At least the nuclear scene was over the top awesome.

Posted By:

Cale

05/28/2008

12:12 PM

It was a fun movie, what the hell do you want from an indian jones adventure film? Seriously, it was all in good fun, something we can take our kids to see. I'm willing to be you don't have a clue as what goes into film making, visual storytelling, creativity, and visual fx, you just sit your fat a s s down, eat 7 hotdogs, drink a gallon of Mr. Phibbs, and complain about miniscule details that most people don't give a crap about. Get a life, learn to have fun, you are missing the point of movies, they are to step out of reality and have some fun. If you think you can do better, write a screen play, get someone to give you 150 million dollars, start your own production and visual fx company and get to work, otherwise, shut the hell up.

Posted By:

FXDFP

05/28/2008

12:56 PM

So because none of us make movies we can't critic a movie. Please sit down if your not going to add to the conversation. The thing is the movie was like everything George Lucas touches these days a let down. He can't seem to stop throwing up CG and unneeded campyness. It was an okay movie but that's all it was and to say that it's wrong to critic a movie with so many flaws is just silly.

Posted By:

Cale

05/28/2008

1:20 PM

It was awful start to finish, but in a good way! I loved it, and even the 'revalation' that they were aliens just made me laugh. Honestly you knew it was gonna be bad, its the fourth one 30 or so years later!

Posted By:

charlie

05/28/2008

1:33 PM

I'm honestly mazed at all the peole defending the film... I tried watching it as an Indy film and gave up after the atom bomb (which had what to do with anything, exactly?), I tried watching it as a *parody* of an Indy film, I tried watching it as a cheesy action movie, I tried imagining it was better than Phantom Menace or Die Another Day... nothing worked. It was terrible. I laughed at about five jokes, I never once felt any suspense or empathy, I groaned about once every 20 minutes and several times I was just dumbfounded with total disbelief that anyone thought something was a good idea. I have to stop now, I've already been bitching about this film the whole way home. Agh.

Posted By:

Wichita Sam

05/28/2008

4:32 PM

This movie was good, if a little cheesey, until the ENding. I think LUcas ruined the Movie. And unlike somone I loved seeing the ark and the Photo of Idy's dad. It was one of the few things that reminded me tis was an INDY film

Posted By:

BOB

05/28/2008

6:24 PM

Either watch grease or get a history lesson from your grandparents and quite yapping about shia's hair.

Posted By:

Van

05/30/2008

08:33 AM

Looks like the zealot fanboys have come out in full force to bash the authors.

Good review. When a movie takes an amazing franchise and sodomizes it like Crystal Skull did, it kills a part of you. And it deserves no mercy. Ignore the fanboys and keep on writing.

Posted By:

SinR

06/01/2008

11:25 PM

This movie was a waste of my time and money. What was worse was they kept sticking in pieces of the old score, almost as if to force you into believing it was a true Indiana Jones film... which it truly wasn't.

Posted By:

Indiana Don't

06/10/2008

01:53 AM

u suck!! that was a great movie so what if it doesnt make sense just sit down , enjoy it and dont have such a crap life that u analyze a movie.... when u arent getting paid for it.

get a life.

Posted By:

scott [Website]

06/13/2009

11:51 AM

Comments are closed

  • popular
  • fresh
  • The Oscars: Who Will Win in 2010?
  • Martin Scorsese, Shutter Island
  • FYI: On DVD/Blu-ray This Week – February 23, 2010
  • FYI: On DVD/Blu-ray This Week – February 16, 2010
  • FYI: On DVD/Blu-ray This Week – February 9, 2010
  • FYI: On DVD/Blu-ray This Week – February 2, 2010
  • James Cameron, Avatar
  • more film
  • [Recorded] The Oscars: Who Will Win in 2010?
  • [Recorded] Martin Scorsese, Shutter Island
  • [Recorded] FYI: On DVD/Blu-ray This Week – February 23, 2010
  • [Recorded] FYI: On DVD/Blu-ray This Week – February 16, 2010
  • [Recorded] FYI: On DVD/Blu-ray This Week – February 9, 2010
  • [Recorded] FYI: On DVD/Blu-ray This Week – February 2, 2010
  • [Recorded] James Cameron, Avatar
  • more from mike turner
  • [Recorded] New Bloods, The Secret Life
  • [Recorded] Top Ten Reasons Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Doesn't Work
Contact • Contribute • Privacy Policy

© 2010 Athens Exchange
Powered By Boxkite Media